Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post Reply
eafictionwriter (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:24 pm

Posting Rank

Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by eafictionwriter (imported) »

I found a doctor who will perform either subcapsular or simple castration on me for $1,500 under local anesthesia.

My question is, has anybody experienced a subcapsular castration? What was the appearance of the testis afterwards? Where you happy with the results? What would be the downside of getting a subcapsular castration?
Hash (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:25 am

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by Hash (imported) »

I have not experienced a subcapsular castration, I have experienced castration. It depends on what you want. Do you want empty remnants of hollowed out non-functioning testicles that will shrivel to almost nothing over time anyways or do you want to be free of your testicles? I looked into subcapsular castration years ago, but to me it's just a money making scheme to maintain some cosmetic look that won't last. If you want to keep the appearance of having testicles, you can get "falsies" put in your scrotum they'll stay plump for as long as you live. http://www.theturekclinic.com/services/ ... -testical/
Paolo
Articles: 0
Posts: 9709
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 8:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by Paolo »

$1,500? Heck of a deal compared to others. Is it Blue Light Special day? Blue balls day?

Sorry...
eafictionwriter (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:24 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by eafictionwriter (imported) »

Subcapsular castration IS castration. It completely guts the testicles, leaving them an empty shell which probably do indeed shrink and retract to nothing over time. To me having my testicles completely gutted leaving useless shrivelled stumps is almost a more powerful form of becoming a eunuch than simple castration. After the surgery (which really is a mutilation of the testicles) i will always be reminded that the hollowed out empty stumps in my shrunken scrotum used to produce testosterone but are now just the shrivelled vines of my formerly ripe grapes. Cost wise for me it is identicle to simple castration. In terms of cost it will be done in a nearby foreign country under sterile professional conditions. I opted for local numbing rather than being out to sleep to save money.
CastratedTomcat (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 521
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:28 am

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by CastratedTomcat (imported) »

The advantage could be the nerves are not cutted and there is no evtl. chronic nerve pain from cutting after it.
Hash (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:25 am

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by Hash (imported) »

CastratedTomcat (imported) wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:51 pm The advantage could be the nerves are not cutted and there is no evtl. chronic nerve pain from cutting after it.

I've never experienced any chronic nerve pain from my castration. Still have chords that are shriveled, but no pain. Sorry if you do.
Hash (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:25 am

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by Hash (imported) »

ea, if you think having the shriveled testicles will remind you that they once produced testosterone, go for it. This is the first I can remember of anyone wanting to have that memory or reminder. For me, not seeing anything or feeling anything is what I wanted to experience and have. Knowing that they were being cut off, priceless.
eafictionwriter (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:24 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by eafictionwriter (imported) »

I can understand that point of view, and at this point I could go either way. I guess there is something to having a completely empty sac. I have been reachung out to several urologists, and actually just found one who will perform full castration or subcapsular for $1,450, including aneasthesia (don't know if its local or general, I definitely only want local, especially in a foreign country). What I am discovering is that anybody that wants their overactive libido fixed, especially if you say you are seeing a therapist for it, can easily be castrated just south of the border by several competent urologists. Anyways, I am open to suggestions if anyone feels strongly one way or the other about subcapsular or simple (complete) castration.
sparkey49 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:54 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Subcapsular vs Simple castration ...

Post by sparkey49 (imported) »

I know I had one totally destroyed testicle and one gone for a while and it isn't the same I couldn't wait and was so glad when the second was gone. I since a short while after removing either testicle never had pain but there was pain with the destroyed testicle till removed.
Post Reply

Return to “Surgical Castration”