Magi, by Pueros

[JesusA (imported)]

A new take on the standard Christmas story. Very nice. I’ll never think of it the same way again. Clearly, either St. Matthew left out some significant details relating to the birth of Jesus, or the early editors of the New Testament removed them from the text. Pueros, you have forever altered my perceptions. Great job.

[Pueros]

I thank Jesus for his kind comments. However, judging from the few views of this thread, there seems little interest in the subject.

This surprises and saddens me, not out of perception or otherwise of the worthiness of ‘Magi’ but rather because of the story’s potentially controversial subject, which I naively thought might induce at least some debate.

Would I therefore be correct in assuming that the reason that this has not happened with this tale, or with my earlier ‘Zheng He’, which I thought might be equally historically provoking, is that the bulk of readers are really only interested in stimulating their penises as opposed to minds as a consequence of their use of eunuch.org?

Is the production of erotica with a certain theme truly to be the sole purpose of the archive?

It would be useful to know the answers to these questions for future storylines.

PUEROS

[Paolo]

Pueros,

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this one.

I will never look at a Manger scene in the same way again! Makes me wonder about that shepherd boy now, he's rather tall and slim and has no beard ...