I have read articles about artificial cryptorchidism as a method used in decreasing fertility and it works in many researches. Because of the body's temperature which affect the sperm and therefore, testosterone. But can it be used as a castration method?
I have tried lately to push them up through the canal but somehow they won't go any further! Like something strong obstructing them. And im wondering if it is actually possible to achieve that without damages. Also, what about later on? Do they actually die? I don't understand that part, because its not like you clamped it or cut the blood flow.
I tried googling, but somehow people interested in castrating their animals instead of themselves.
Cryptorchidism can lead to castration?
-
Darkness_Burn (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:07 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
raymar2020 (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:43 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Cryptorchidism can lead to castration?
As a person who was born with bi-lateral cryptorchism I can comment on this. In most cases, it occurs because the testicles have not fully developed.There are multiple stages, in some cases the testicles are unable to be located at birth, as was the case with me. In others they are either high or low in the inguinal canals and have not dropped into the scrotum. Both types can lead to removal of the testicles, as in their underdeveloped state, they are prone to infection, and possible stranulation as the child grows.
In the 50's , a pretty standard treatment was to simply remove them if they had not developed and dropped by age one. That is the reason there are so many single testicle guys in my generation. Still others saw both removed , either because they had not developed or because they became infected in their entrapped location.
Those who had cryptorchidism are twice as likely to have fertility issues, and are much more prone to testicular cancer than any other single group. In most cases the testicles drop normally or a surgeon assists with a procedure called orchiopexy.
With changing times, and a desire in the medical field to maximize the profit on each patient, there seems to be a reversal, in the 70's and on thru to the 90's doctors were much more reluctant to remove undescended testicles. They played wait and see games, or did orchiopexies, but these days the standard recommendation is much more like it was in the 50's, just get them out of there.
For an adult male, the body temperature will retard sperm porduction, and testicles in the inguinal canals may well not produce as much testosterone, or due to constricted blood flow less testosterone will get into the blood stream. Log term the testicles become more of a cancer risk if they remain in the inguinal canals.
While embedding the testicles could have the effect of lowering testosterone, and certainly hampering sperm production, it would hardly be equal to castration. Fertility reduced is not castration, and even if the testosterone level is lowered having the testicles present and even marginally functional is NOT castration.
As a castrated male, I can say that IMHO the lack of testicles is a much more aesthetically pleasing look, but placing them in the inguinal canals carries far too much risk to use that as a means of achieving that look. It will NOT effect castration, unless the blood supply to the testicles is compromised, and they die, and then there is serious rosk of untold numbers of issues.
Raymar
In the 50's , a pretty standard treatment was to simply remove them if they had not developed and dropped by age one. That is the reason there are so many single testicle guys in my generation. Still others saw both removed , either because they had not developed or because they became infected in their entrapped location.
Those who had cryptorchidism are twice as likely to have fertility issues, and are much more prone to testicular cancer than any other single group. In most cases the testicles drop normally or a surgeon assists with a procedure called orchiopexy.
With changing times, and a desire in the medical field to maximize the profit on each patient, there seems to be a reversal, in the 70's and on thru to the 90's doctors were much more reluctant to remove undescended testicles. They played wait and see games, or did orchiopexies, but these days the standard recommendation is much more like it was in the 50's, just get them out of there.
For an adult male, the body temperature will retard sperm porduction, and testicles in the inguinal canals may well not produce as much testosterone, or due to constricted blood flow less testosterone will get into the blood stream. Log term the testicles become more of a cancer risk if they remain in the inguinal canals.
While embedding the testicles could have the effect of lowering testosterone, and certainly hampering sperm production, it would hardly be equal to castration. Fertility reduced is not castration, and even if the testosterone level is lowered having the testicles present and even marginally functional is NOT castration.
As a castrated male, I can say that IMHO the lack of testicles is a much more aesthetically pleasing look, but placing them in the inguinal canals carries far too much risk to use that as a means of achieving that look. It will NOT effect castration, unless the blood supply to the testicles is compromised, and they die, and then there is serious rosk of untold numbers of issues.
Raymar
Re: Cryptorchidism can lead to castration?
Back in the 90's, a co-worker's little boy was born with this condition. They waited until he was just over 3 before doing an orchipexy, of course, they had modern tools to find them and fish them out and down. The doctors informed her of the cancer risk, but told her that he would be sterile, but would develop normally in regards to puberty. They were anchored in place, and all's well there.
As for animals, our latest dump-out dog only had one testicle. Whatever they call that little pad thingy...they located it and ended up doing moderate surgery to get it out, because the vet said it would still produce testosterone but not sperm.
I don't think, as a mature human, that tucking up your testicles is going to help with testosterone production.
As for animals, our latest dump-out dog only had one testicle. Whatever they call that little pad thingy...they located it and ended up doing moderate surgery to get it out, because the vet said it would still produce testosterone but not sperm.
I don't think, as a mature human, that tucking up your testicles is going to help with testosterone production.
-
artisticlicense (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:45 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Cryptorchidism can lead to castration?
The thoughts, and practices of pushing the testicles up is as old as the hills. Ask any drag queen how to 'tuck'.
It is actually possible to gently push your testicles up into the canals, and hold them there with tight underwear or other appliances and clothing.
Eventually they can either work their way farther up into the canal, diminish in size due to restrictions, or even penetrate the peritoneal cavity; where they can cause you havoc, or exist for years without troubles.
I grew up with a boy whose testicles didn't drop, and his family couldn't do anything about it. He beat off more than I did! I have no idea what happened to him after high school. I always wondered though.
I
I tried wearing super tight boys underwear for a long time, thinking it would eventually diminish the size and function of my testicles. It did nothing except allow me a vacant-looking crotch in my jeans. I could go all day working, and most nights sleeping in those tightie-whities, but eventually got irritated due to skin rubbing behind the scrotum.
When I did tuck, the left testicle wouldn't go up high enough, but my right would practically disappear. I had a bump in my briefs. Eventually, I got tired of the trouble and went back to adult sized undies, or commando (mostly commando).
When I was working for the Government, my sperm was tested in my late 20's; big-"0". Sterile. I figured that's why I was such a 'calm' teen-ager. I learned much later it was because of my undescended testicles didn't develop the ability to produce viable sperm. I did produce some testosterone.
I masturbated frequently as a teen-ager. I eventually lost ability to gain satisfactory erections in my 20's. I can still achieve mild erections, and orgasms, but they are few and far between today. Back then, it was unheard of for a man to 'admit' to lack of erectile ability. My doctor never suggested any 'medicinal-help', like HRT; and things like Viagra didn't exist.
If you want to 'play' with tight tucking; use body powders, and don't get too carried away with the 'play'. Let the things 'air-out'.
If you want a smooth groin, do like a lot of drag queens do; wear multiple pairs of panty hose over a tight pair of underwear (or tights, spanx, etc). There are a lot of fabrics today that allow air to circulate, but your skin will still get raw back between your legs.
It is actually possible to gently push your testicles up into the canals, and hold them there with tight underwear or other appliances and clothing.
Eventually they can either work their way farther up into the canal, diminish in size due to restrictions, or even penetrate the peritoneal cavity; where they can cause you havoc, or exist for years without troubles.
I grew up with a boy whose testicles didn't drop, and his family couldn't do anything about it. He beat off more than I did! I have no idea what happened to him after high school. I always wondered though.
I
dism. I had surgery when I was 5. My left testicle is still stuck to the scrotum, but the right one worked free in my teens.
I tried wearing super tight boys underwear for a long time, thinking it would eventually diminish the size and function of my testicles. It did nothing except allow me a vacant-looking crotch in my jeans. I could go all day working, and most nights sleeping in those tightie-whities, but eventually got irritated due to skin rubbing behind the scrotum.
When I did tuck, the left testicle wouldn't go up high enough, but my right would practically disappear. I had a bump in my briefs. Eventually, I got tired of the trouble and went back to adult sized undies, or commando (mostly commando).
When I was working for the Government, my sperm was tested in my late 20's; big-"0". Sterile. I figured that's why I was such a 'calm' teen-ager. I learned much later it was because of my undescended testicles didn't develop the ability to produce viable sperm. I did produce some testosterone.
I masturbated frequently as a teen-ager. I eventually lost ability to gain satisfactory erections in my 20's. I can still achieve mild erections, and orgasms, but they are few and far between today. Back then, it was unheard of for a man to 'admit' to lack of erectile ability. My doctor never suggested any 'medicinal-help', like HRT; and things like Viagra didn't exist.
If you want to 'play' with tight tucking; use body powders, and don't get too carried away with the 'play'. Let the things 'air-out'.
If you want a smooth groin, do like a lot of drag queens do; wear multiple pairs of panty hose over a tight pair of underwear (or tights, spanx, etc). There are a lot of fabrics today that allow air to circulate, but your skin will still get raw back between your legs.
-
artisticlicense (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:45 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Cryptorchidism can lead to castration?
Darkness_Burn (imported) wrote: Fri Dec 06, 2013 4:09 am I have read articles about artificial cryptorchidism as a method used in decreasing fertility and it works in many researches. Because of the body's temperature which affect the sperm and therefore, testosterone. But can it be used as a castration method?
I have tried lately to push them up through the canal but somehow they won't go any further! Like something strong obstructing them. And im wondering if it is actually possible to achieve that without damages. Also, what about later on? Do they actually die? I don't understand that part, because its not like you clamped it or cut the blood flow.
I tried googling, but somehow people interested in castrating their animals instead of themselves.
You aren't using the correct search terminology. Try 'tucking my penis', 'drag tuck', 'tucking for drag'. Tons of queens that love to post their 'stuff' and experiences!