talula wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:03 pm What gripes me about the concept of digital memories is the fact that folks take "lasting" photographs, shots that happen only once in a lifetime and can never happen again, with a $40 camera they got on the rack at the gas station near the cashier. More than once I've been given photos for a website and asked to improve them so they look good, but the truth is, if you take a picture that looks like poop it will always look like poop.
AMEN!
And when it's a crisis, it's a bad photo, a bad file, a Crappy-Camera masterpiece along the lines of a fine Holga (a cult crappy classic, click here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holga ) and of course, it's all up to ME to fix it and make everything right.
You can polish a turd all day long, and at 5PM, it still smells like shit.
If I had a dollar for every time I've been expected to wave my magic wand and make a shitty image perfect, I could retire and buy a Lexus dealership and burn a car each night to roast hot dogs and marshmallows over.
I would also argue the longevity of stored analog media. I just scanned about 6 rolls of old Kodak B&W 'Safety Film' from WWII.
The images were amazing. Then again, I scanned a 6cmx6cm negative at 4800 DPI. No, it was NOT shot with a Holga.
And no, unplugged and/or boxed digital media will not survive the coming wrath of the sun, unless stored in a Faraday Cage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage