Don'tchya Miss the Cold War

[janekane (imported)]

I became aware of what I regard as terrorism well before I was one year of age. I observed children who were a few to several months older than I was being terrorized by their parents, terrorized by their parents in ways my parents did not terrorize me.

When I was about 18 months of age, I had learned enough of the so-called "Social Contract" (like, in the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau commonly known in English as the social contract) to have been able to reject any and every form of "reality as defined by social contract" from my life. I have always lived totally, absolutely, and completely outside the realm of the "rule of law" as ensconced in the "Anglo-American Adversarial System of Law and Jurisprudence," doing so because I have always recognized its essential foundational premise as being an absolute, eternal falsehood.

That premise is simply that a person who actually did something deemed actually wrong by actual social reality consensus could actually have done other than the actually person did.

Why so many dratted uses of forms of "actual" in the above social contract nonsense? Because I find that reality as defined by the consensus of central-tendency-based reality wherein people make avoidable mistakes and/or have avoidable accidents is based on hypotheticals which are absolutely impossible to actualize.

My bioengineering research, the focus of which, to put it succinctly, is terrorism and terrorism prevention, understood with such rigorous scientific accuracy in the form of an evolutionary biology model, that testing the model for errors will result in the elimination of terrorism from the human way of living.

I have always actually understood that no mistake ever actually made and/or no accident which ever actually happened, could actually have been prevented through any actually achievable process.

Have I read von Clausewitz in the J. J. Graham translation, now in the public domain? Yes. Have I read Sun Tzu, in the R. L. Wing translation (not public domain)? Yes. Do I have those books in my library? Yes.

What I especially like about the R. L. Wing translation of Sun Tzu is my finding it being framed more from the view of preventing war than winning it.

My view is based largely on my having never gone through the infant-child transition (sometimes called "the terrible twos") that is typical for what may be most people at around age of 18 months. This transition is so terrible, from a neurological stance, that it generates amnesia for the direct truthfulness of newborn infants in most adults. This terrible transition is the essence of the biology of terrorism, for it teaches those who go through it that it is better to be dishonest than to be honest and better to be dishonest about being dishonest than to be honest about being dishonest.

Deception, as a neurological phenomenon, has a curious feature which I have consistently noted among humans. A human who is deceived (regarding something) is consciously oblivious to being deceived, this being the simple consequence of a human being aware of being deceived is identically contiguous with a human being not deceived. To be deceived is to be consciously unaware of being deceived.

Benjamin Libet, a physiologist, began the study of human decision-making brain processes in 1959. After more than 50 years of working to understand how humans make choices, he published his book, "Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness," Harvard University Press, 2004. LIbet's work demonstrates that a "normal" person makes a decision unconsciously about 500 milliseconds before becoming consciously aware of the decision, and the conscious mind confabulates having made the decision actually previously made unconsciously. Libet's work may be the Achilles' heel of the notion of "Free Will" making people accountable for their mistakes in the methodology of adversarial law and jurisprudence.

What my work shows, and apparently shows without possible refutation, is that the belief that people make avoidable mistakes has been, from the view of evolutionary biology, itself an unavoidable mistake about the nature of mistakes.

What my work shows, and apparently shows without possible refutation, is that the belief that avoidable accidents happen has been, from the view of evolutionary biology, itself an unavoidable accident intrinsic to the process of evolution itself.

The infant-child transition is the coercive indoctrination of children into the social contract of deception, and is the essence of terrorism itself.

[A-1 (imported)]

I BELIEVE that YOU just are just missing being YOUNG...