How about doing something to the penis during puberty so it grows all out of shape and incapable of sexual gratification. Maybe surgery or preventing it developing normally.
[email protected]
Making penis deformed
-
dhr (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07 am
-
Posting Rank
-
happousai (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 10:30 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
Groot Voel (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 10:48 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Making penis deformed
Can a split penis (balls intact) still get hard, and is the person able to impregnate a woman. Is there any FAQ on the web in this regard?
Re: Making penis deformed
The custom of splitting the penis seems to have originated with some Australian Aborigines who worshipped a totem lizard God who had a split penis, much like his forked tongue. The operation seems to have lost its popularity to date, but not with everyone.
According to Brenda K. Love in The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sexual Practices,
PENIS MODIFICATION pp.206
SPLITTING - Splitting the penis from the glans toward the base was a ritual practiced by a group of Australian aborigines who worshipped a totem lizard that had a split penis. Most men practiced a less dramatic form of subincision. One Anglo man success-fully attempted this procedure and describes the results as follows. My decision to surgically remodel my genitals was deliberate, of deep satisfaction to me, highly exciting, sexually adventurous, and erotically exhilarating... Full erections are still maintained as previously, but now in two complete, separate halves. The erotic zones of my penis are still the same, with orgasms and ejaculations functioning perfectly. Entry into the vagina requires a little extra effort for insertion, but once my penis is inside, its opened effect on the vaginas inner lining is more pronounced, giving better female orgasmic feelings (PFIQ #15, by Carl Carroll). His account was accompanied by an actual photo. The splitting supposedly took several years to complete.
SUBINCISION Subincision refers to the cutting of part of the glans penis from the tip toward the base. The length of the cut varies according to the custom of the tribes who engage in this practice. Tribes in New Guinea used to make an incision in the glans that was up to about 3/4 in length. Some men in these tribes had two incisions that laid perpendicular to the shaft.
According to Brenda K. Love in The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sexual Practices,
PENIS MODIFICATION pp.206
SPLITTING - Splitting the penis from the glans toward the base was a ritual practiced by a group of Australian aborigines who worshipped a totem lizard that had a split penis. Most men practiced a less dramatic form of subincision. One Anglo man success-fully attempted this procedure and describes the results as follows. My decision to surgically remodel my genitals was deliberate, of deep satisfaction to me, highly exciting, sexually adventurous, and erotically exhilarating... Full erections are still maintained as previously, but now in two complete, separate halves. The erotic zones of my penis are still the same, with orgasms and ejaculations functioning perfectly. Entry into the vagina requires a little extra effort for insertion, but once my penis is inside, its opened effect on the vaginas inner lining is more pronounced, giving better female orgasmic feelings (PFIQ #15, by Carl Carroll). His account was accompanied by an actual photo. The splitting supposedly took several years to complete.
SUBINCISION Subincision refers to the cutting of part of the glans penis from the tip toward the base. The length of the cut varies according to the custom of the tribes who engage in this practice. Tribes in New Guinea used to make an incision in the glans that was up to about 3/4 in length. Some men in these tribes had two incisions that laid perpendicular to the shaft.
-
Groot Voel (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 10:48 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Making penis deformed
Firstly thanks to Paola for answering my question iro of the splitting of the penis.
I believe that the process of artificially making it impossible for a penis to impregnate a woman (or man for that matter) is called infibulation (an alternative to castration). I understand that in the Louvre museum in France, that there are two statues of Roman slave twins of Germanic origin, who have their penises doubled up with a pin piercing such doubling up so that no proper erection can take place. The museun comment evidently is to the effect that such slaves were employed in heavy labour, and if castrated would have been too weak for such employment. (One just wonders how they managed to urinate?). In any event, I am sure that any man with intact testes and normal testosterone production, by being either impotent, sexually mutualted, or sexually deformed, must at the same time be an emotionally sexually frustrated person.
Somewhere else, not so long ago, I read on this Board, that one of the correspondents to this Board had his penis badly deformed due to a botched penile implant operation, in fact losing most of his penis due to a series of operations. I personally find it very sad when such things happen. What better toy can a man find which can give him such joy and pleasure other than what the Creator gave every man, namely his penis. A man can be in prison, can be alone in the veld, rejected by society, be depressed, a misfit, etc, but in this all men are equal, and that is that his toy is always with him to give him pleasure
Quoting dhrdhr (imported) wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07 am How about doing something to the penis during puberty so it grows all out of shape and incapable of sexual gratification. Maybe surgery or preventing it developing normally.
Firstly thanks to Paola for answering my question iro of the splitting of the penis.
I believe that the process of artificially making it impossible for a penis to impregnate a woman (or man for that matter) is called infibulation (an alternative to castration). I understand that in the Louvre museum in France, that there are two statues of Roman slave twins of Germanic origin, who have their penises doubled up with a pin piercing such doubling up so that no proper erection can take place. The museun comment evidently is to the effect that such slaves were employed in heavy labour, and if castrated would have been too weak for such employment. (One just wonders how they managed to urinate?). In any event, I am sure that any man with intact testes and normal testosterone production, by being either impotent, sexually mutualted, or sexually deformed, must at the same time be an emotionally sexually frustrated person.
Somewhere else, not so long ago, I read on this Board, that one of the correspondents to this Board had his penis badly deformed due to a botched penile implant operation, in fact losing most of his penis due to a series of operations. I personally find it very sad when such things happen. What better toy can a man find which can give him such joy and pleasure other than what the Creator gave every man, namely his penis. A man can be in prison, can be alone in the veld, rejected by society, be depressed, a misfit, etc, but in this all men are equal, and that is that his toy is always with him to give him pleasure
-
SplitDik (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 1:08 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Making penis deformed
I've been trying to find a picture of the statues you referred to. I'm still looking, but found a couple other ones that are kind of fun:
This guy is a "poly-phallic" statue found in Pompeii:
http://tigtail.org/L_View/TVM/E/Ancient ... .c50bc.jpg
Interestingly, despite the emphasis on the penis, there is no emphasis on the testicles.
Here's a statue of Priapus (for which the condition of prolonged, painful erection, priapism, is named):
http://tigtail.org/L_View/TVM/E/Ancient ... .c50bc.jpg
This guy is a "poly-phallic" statue found in Pompeii:
http://tigtail.org/L_View/TVM/E/Ancient ... .c50bc.jpg
Interestingly, despite the emphasis on the penis, there is no emphasis on the testicles.
Here's a statue of Priapus (for which the condition of prolonged, painful erection, priapism, is named):
http://tigtail.org/L_View/TVM/E/Ancient ... .c50bc.jpg
-
Groot Voel (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 10:48 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Making penis deformed
Split Dick. I really liked and enjoyed the photos.
The following was extracted from the Yahoo search engine, using the word INFIBULATION:
Slave Infibulation in Ancient Greece and Rome
It is well known that slave infibulation was practiced in ancient Greece and Rome. Precisely how this was done is less well known. This article is based on what documentary evidence exists together with some research of my own.
Infibulation of Male Slaves:
There are two enormous Roman statues, more than life-size, of naked slaves in the Louvre Museum in Paris, France. Both have their penises bent double so that the head points towards the body. In the one on the left, the penis head lies on top of the shaft; in the other the penis head is on the left of the shaft. In both, the sculptor has been exact in his work, and it is possible to make out the size and position of the rings.
Taking the one on the left first, the ring is clearly quite large, possibly an inch and a quarter in the original. The ring passes horizontally through the shaft of the penis, a little behind the glans. The other half of the ring is attached close to the trunk of the slave, and, judging from its position, passes horizontally either through the shaft of the penis at its point of attachment or through the suspensory ligament.
In the second case, the ring is a little smaller. It has passed vertically through the shaft of penis again close behind the glans, and a little to the side of the urethra. The other side of the ring is again attached close to the torso and passes vertically either through the shaft of the penis close to its base, or through the suspensory ligament.
The two slaves are clearly a matched pair, heavy, muscular, with short curly hair, and as alike as brothers. The body proportions suggests a possibly Germanic origin.
There is documentary evidence to suggest that the rings were fitted shortly before puberty or just at its onset. They would be of bronze, and welded shut by pieces of red-hot charcoal and a blow-pipe. Erections must have been very painful, and it is certain that the slaves could never achieve penetration. Orgasm and ejaculation would have been infrequent. and probably avoided as far as that was possible.
Such slaves were preferred to eunuchs. Eunuchs were prone to a number of health problems and would never be as strong as a fully mature man. Infibulated like this, there would be no risk of pregnancy amongst the female slaves, (and they would be infibulated also), nor of violation of the free-women and children of the house-hold. The slaves would tend to avoid thoughts of sex, because of the pain of erections, and would thus concentrate on working hard for their master.
Infibulation of Female Slaves:
There are references in the literature of the period to "chastity chains" being used on female slaves; there is, however, no description or illustration of how this was achieved. There are also many references stating that female slaves were infibulated, but again, no description or illustration of how this was done. I have seen two exhibits in the British Museum in London, England, which I think may well be an example of such a chastity chain or infibulation chain. They are labeled as "unknown, possibly horse harness ornaments". There is a diagram of the site where they were found showing that the pieces were found near the crotch positions of two skeletons, identified on the diagram as "females, probably slaves". Nothing else of horse origin was noted in this diagram.
Each exhibit consists of a small portion of what looks like poor quality chain maile. The rings are of bronze, rather larger and thinner than one would want for effective armour. Each ring is about 3/4 inch diameter and about 1/16 inch thick. They are welded shut rather untidily, some have large blobs at the point of union, some rings are off-set at the join: they are not ornaments. Each exhibit is symmetrical with about twelve rings along the centre-line. There is a row of ten rings on either side, each ring interlocking with two in the centre-line. There is a further row of eight either side of this, again each ring interlocks with two in the adjacent row. The whole thing is about six inches long and about two and a half inches wide. Roughly at the centre of the group, two of the rings are heavily corroded, and in one of the exhibits, one ring has a short gap.
It is possible to imagine that these might be infibulation or chastity chains. Each ring in the centre-line pierces both of the large lips along the whole line of the vulva, holding the two sides in close proximity. The rows either side would penetrate deep into the flesh of each of the large lips. The whole of the sensitive area of the vulva would be impossible to touch or stimulate. It is possible that some of the links would deliberately pass through the crura of the clitoris so as to give pain on arousal and thus discourage any interest in sex. Certainly, if fitted before puberty, the growing of the parts would apply tension to the rings so that any attempt to masturbate would be painful.
If these are, indeed, infibulation chains covering the vulva of a female slave, the positions of the corroded and damaged links would exactly correspond to that of the urine flow.
From the owner's point of view, infibulation of the female slaves has all the advantages of the infibulation of male slaves. They are there to work and nothing else, and so any possibility of distraction is removed without impairing their health in any way.
From the slave's point of view, I just wonder what it felt like as the 48 rings were put into position and then welded shut.
The following was extracted from the Yahoo search engine, using the word INFIBULATION:
Slave Infibulation in Ancient Greece and Rome
It is well known that slave infibulation was practiced in ancient Greece and Rome. Precisely how this was done is less well known. This article is based on what documentary evidence exists together with some research of my own.
Infibulation of Male Slaves:
There are two enormous Roman statues, more than life-size, of naked slaves in the Louvre Museum in Paris, France. Both have their penises bent double so that the head points towards the body. In the one on the left, the penis head lies on top of the shaft; in the other the penis head is on the left of the shaft. In both, the sculptor has been exact in his work, and it is possible to make out the size and position of the rings.
Taking the one on the left first, the ring is clearly quite large, possibly an inch and a quarter in the original. The ring passes horizontally through the shaft of the penis, a little behind the glans. The other half of the ring is attached close to the trunk of the slave, and, judging from its position, passes horizontally either through the shaft of the penis at its point of attachment or through the suspensory ligament.
In the second case, the ring is a little smaller. It has passed vertically through the shaft of penis again close behind the glans, and a little to the side of the urethra. The other side of the ring is again attached close to the torso and passes vertically either through the shaft of the penis close to its base, or through the suspensory ligament.
The two slaves are clearly a matched pair, heavy, muscular, with short curly hair, and as alike as brothers. The body proportions suggests a possibly Germanic origin.
There is documentary evidence to suggest that the rings were fitted shortly before puberty or just at its onset. They would be of bronze, and welded shut by pieces of red-hot charcoal and a blow-pipe. Erections must have been very painful, and it is certain that the slaves could never achieve penetration. Orgasm and ejaculation would have been infrequent. and probably avoided as far as that was possible.
Such slaves were preferred to eunuchs. Eunuchs were prone to a number of health problems and would never be as strong as a fully mature man. Infibulated like this, there would be no risk of pregnancy amongst the female slaves, (and they would be infibulated also), nor of violation of the free-women and children of the house-hold. The slaves would tend to avoid thoughts of sex, because of the pain of erections, and would thus concentrate on working hard for their master.
Infibulation of Female Slaves:
There are references in the literature of the period to "chastity chains" being used on female slaves; there is, however, no description or illustration of how this was achieved. There are also many references stating that female slaves were infibulated, but again, no description or illustration of how this was done. I have seen two exhibits in the British Museum in London, England, which I think may well be an example of such a chastity chain or infibulation chain. They are labeled as "unknown, possibly horse harness ornaments". There is a diagram of the site where they were found showing that the pieces were found near the crotch positions of two skeletons, identified on the diagram as "females, probably slaves". Nothing else of horse origin was noted in this diagram.
Each exhibit consists of a small portion of what looks like poor quality chain maile. The rings are of bronze, rather larger and thinner than one would want for effective armour. Each ring is about 3/4 inch diameter and about 1/16 inch thick. They are welded shut rather untidily, some have large blobs at the point of union, some rings are off-set at the join: they are not ornaments. Each exhibit is symmetrical with about twelve rings along the centre-line. There is a row of ten rings on either side, each ring interlocking with two in the centre-line. There is a further row of eight either side of this, again each ring interlocks with two in the adjacent row. The whole thing is about six inches long and about two and a half inches wide. Roughly at the centre of the group, two of the rings are heavily corroded, and in one of the exhibits, one ring has a short gap.
It is possible to imagine that these might be infibulation or chastity chains. Each ring in the centre-line pierces both of the large lips along the whole line of the vulva, holding the two sides in close proximity. The rows either side would penetrate deep into the flesh of each of the large lips. The whole of the sensitive area of the vulva would be impossible to touch or stimulate. It is possible that some of the links would deliberately pass through the crura of the clitoris so as to give pain on arousal and thus discourage any interest in sex. Certainly, if fitted before puberty, the growing of the parts would apply tension to the rings so that any attempt to masturbate would be painful.
If these are, indeed, infibulation chains covering the vulva of a female slave, the positions of the corroded and damaged links would exactly correspond to that of the urine flow.
From the owner's point of view, infibulation of the female slaves has all the advantages of the infibulation of male slaves. They are there to work and nothing else, and so any possibility of distraction is removed without impairing their health in any way.
From the slave's point of view, I just wonder what it felt like as the 48 rings were put into position and then welded shut.
-
cutmydick (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2002 4:08 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
nullone2be (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 6:04 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
_g (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2001 12:03 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Making penis deformed
dhr (imported) wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07 am How about doing something to the penis during puberty so it grows all out of shape and incapable of sexual gratification. Maybe surgery or preventing it developing normally.
[email protected]
Are you sure you wish this. There is information about penis deformities on the web which if used, is very PAINFULL (I'ved used on method). And if you changed your mind it will cost $$$$ to a surgeon to maybe fix.
_g