kazman0608 (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:06 pm
Well reading this post about calcium chloride, I started to work in a kitchen and I noticed a container of food grade calcium chloride 77%. It just reminded me of this post, I really wouldn't c
kazman0608 (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:06 pm
Well reading this post about calcium chloride, I started to work in a kitchen and I noticed a container of food grade calcium chloride 77%. It just reminded me of this post, I r
Hi everyone, well it's been just over 2 months. Both testes have reduced in volume by 30% (from ~21 cc each to 15 cc each) and seem to be continuing to shrink. I believe I am now sterile, my ejaculate is completely clear and nowhere near as thick .
I haven't noticed any reduced erectile function or libido, however I'm on estrogen so I expect that's why. I am now however completely in control of my libido now which is nice.
Was properly castrated in hospital yesterday. It took exactly 6 months from the first CaCl injection to get them removed. Job done. Really happy even if the swelling is larger than that from the injection.
kazman0608 (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:06 pm
Well reading this post about calcium chloride, I started to work in a kitchen and I noticed a container of food grade calcium chloride 77%. It just reminded me of this post, I
Frida G Cavic (imported
[/quote]
) wrote:Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:03 am
hoose calcium chloride as a way
for castration, think it would be too painful.
It is certainly painful. However ALL castration methods are painful. If you read the accounts of people physically castrated they often have to recover for weeks. Burdizzo of course is really painful. And so on.
The calcium chloride pain lasts about two to three days. It can be significant -- you'll wish you hadn't done it, you'll won't be able to get much sleep. But then it's gone and the balls are totally hard and numb.
In my opinion, in terms of all the factors of cost, ease, effectiveness, danger, pain, calcium chloride is pretty good way to go if you're going to DIY.
SplitDik (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:31 pm
It is certainly painful. However ALL castration methods are painful. If you read the accounts of people physically castrated they often have to recover for weeks. Burdizzo of course is really painful. And so on.
The calcium chloride pain lasts about two to three days. It can be significant -- you'll wish you hadn't done it, you'll won't be able to get much sleep. But then it's gone and the balls are totally hard and numb.
In my opinion, in terms of all the factors of cost, ease, effectiveness, danger, pain, calcium chloride is pretty good way to go if you're going to DIY.
Very well, and succinctly put. I totally agree with the above statement. I injected, and this is (in the most brief way) describes what I felt. I was supposed to see doctor in December and never went. I'm glad I've waited however, my testicle volume or size is even smaller than in December.
I do have a question. Now that my testicles are so small and stay up inside most of the time. If the doctor says they need to come out. Is it more complicated for there removal? Also, because I know how they have atrophied, and can be certain its due to the calcium chloride, and not cancer, what are the consequences of leaving them in. From what ive read most say just get them out to be safe. However lets assume it is safe to leave them in. Any answers would provide me with greater insight. I'm certain they are done. Erections are not spontaneous, and ejaculation is about dime size and very clear. Also if I don't try to exercise, or masturbate myself once a day, it is very difficult to become erect. My facial hair takes literally 4 days longer to grow than what I used to achieve in 1 day. My legs look hips and butt, look feminine now. Energy is gone. I have to force myself to excercise every day now. My pec's are soft and my arms are getting thinner. So I can say I'm happy with those changes.
SplitDik (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:31 pm
In my opinion, in terms of all the factors of cost, ease, effectiveness, danger, pain, calcium chloride is pretty good way to go if you're going to DIY.
I´d dare to say that is a bit less risky and efective by far than chemicall castration which has caused me a lot of troubles now (high lipids and high prolactin etc),If anyone gonna use chemicals, even for a trial It´s better that you are medically supervised.Now I´m convinced that self-medication could be as risky as any other DIY methods. but no matter how many time we repeat this, only experienced by oneself you realise the consequences and the health outcomes of self-med. Surprinsingly I got more T supression with cacl2 injections than on hormones. My last T test was 0 ng/ml ! and I was not on hormones since one month when the test was done!
rikerscage (imported) wrote: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:57 am
I do have a question. Now that my testicles are so small and stay up inside most of the time. If the doctor says they need to come out. Is it more complicated for there removal? Also, because I know how they have atrophied, and can be certain its due to the calcium chloride, and not cancer, what are the consequences of leaving them in. From what ive read most say just get them out to be safe. However lets assume it is safe to leave them in. Any answers would provide me with greater insight. I'm certain they are done. Erections are not spontaneous, and ejaculation is about dime size and very clear. Also if I don't try to exercise, or masturbate myself once a day, it is very difficult to become erect. My facial hair takes literally 4 days longer to grow than what I used to achieve in 1 day. My legs look hips and butt, look feminine now. Energy is gone. I have to force myself to excercise every day now. My pec's are soft and my arms are getting thinner. So I can say I'm happy with those changes.
I ask myself the same question.Tomorrow I will have a testicular scan appointment, so I will be able to answer your question when show scan results to my doctor.