cutoneuk (imported) wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2013 6:47 pm
I agree with the people that say the sex of the Doctor does not matter. I want to be a eunuch and I would not let the sex of the doctor prevent me from achieving this.
There is an attraction for some men here to be emasculated by a woman if they had that opportunity. While in the end it doesn't really matter what the sex of the doctor is who performs the surgery, there remains the knowledge that it was a female who neutered you, although it is no longer an erotic memory since your sexuality has been changed in the process.
considering (imported) wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:01 pm
To take this utterly foolish argument to some sort of further stupidity....about two months ago I had a total shoulder replacement, great success, the doctor is very proud of his work as well he should be. But...several people have said to me...weren't you concerned? He's Chinese you know and the situation with China....well, I'd be on my guard". After I heard this ridiculousness I pointed out that he is ethnic Chinese, his family has lived in the United States for five generations and he was born in Chicago. That didn't settle them. They started to say..."but what if his relatives in China....." and I walked away. My point here is that we should see any medical professional regardless as to their sex, sexual preference, country of origin, religious preference or colour. In a couple of weeks I'm having my Colonoscopy-every three years-that doctor is from Egypt and I have no concerns nor should I have.
If we go to a particular physician, surgeon or other medical person because of some characteristic then we have made the first of a number of errors. My dermatologist is a woman and I no more believe she understands skin because she's a woman than she believes I under shaving because I'm a man. She's an expert and that's what I want. It's what we all should want. Why we don't eludes me but, read above, and you'll find the dissenting speeches from those who feel we should select a doctor based on sex. We all have our own opinions.
It would make me much more likely to do so, and if I did get castrated it would definately have to be done by a woman assisted by an all woman surgical team. But then, I have a lot of fantasies and fetishes connected with being castrated. So if there was a pretty, young, woman urologist who offers castrations it would make me more likely to get castrated if I could get done by her.
I would want to be wearing a long sleeve shirt with my arms covered in long sleeves, and I would want the woman surgeon to be wearing a long sleeve shirt or surgical gown with her sleeves rolled up or pushed up above her elbows when she is castrating me.
My real dream come true would be to be married to a very pretty, young, woman surgeon or urologist or veterinarian and for her to roll up her sleeves rolling them up above her elbows and for her to castrate me under only a local anesthetic assisted by an all woman surgical team. My dream then would be to spend the rest of my life serving her as her personal eunuch slave.
Even if it was done by a woman doctor who was not necessarily my mistress, there would be a certsin something in experiencing and knowing that my castration was performed by a woman.
unencumbered (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:09 pm
I was castrated by a female urologist, with an all-female nursing staff but, like AtomicMush, it was general anesthesia and there was nothing erotic about it. I laid down on the operating room table and the next thing I knew I was waking up in recovery.
Dear unencumbered, I am looking to be surgically castrated as a preventative measure for prostate cancer, due to two close relations suffering from the disease. I would very much preffer to have a female urologist perform the procedure. I don't suppose you would mind forwarding the details of the female urologist who performed your procedure. I would be forever in your debt. Kind regards, Geldwish
It seems that many men who develop prostate cancer die in old age from something else; however, other men die from prostate cancer prior to old age; it seems to depend on how "aggressive" the cancer is, and the only way to know for sure that one has the aggressive form that will cause one's death is to be taking one's final gasp, whether conscious of it or not.
My view of prostate cancer, being of a family in which a number of close relatives died of cancer well prior to old age, is that a family history of prostate cancer, and waiting for cancer to develop, may be much like playing "Russian roulette" with a revolver with an arbitrary, random, and completely unknown number of bullets in the cylinder.
Suppose the revolver is a "six-shooter." That would make for a 1 in 6 chance of dying for sure from cancer in this little tale of woe.
I had indications pointing to my being, more likely than not, at the 100.000... (where "..." means infinitely repeating decimal) chance of dying from cancer unless I parted my life from my colon and testicles. Angelina Jolie deemed 87 percent to be at or above the "action threshold" for surgical reduction of cancer risk.
At the time of my surgeries, in 1986, the condition I have been subsequently found to have, "attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis" was not to be found in the list of known cancer risk diagnoses. My biology and bioengineering background informed me that my family had a cancer risk factor, clearly genetic, and clearly not then (in 1986) recognized as such. There was one little detail that captured my attention, one that almost all the physicians I consulted quite summarily dismissed. That was a tendency for epidermoid cysts, and, alas, it is now recognized as one of the clear signs of the condition I have.
My gastroenterology surgeon was a woman, and was the most highly recommended surgeon I was able to find. For reasons I deem important, I do not state the gender of the doctor who did the orchiectomy, as one condition that doctor set was my never identifying that person, because of stigma and prejudice against castration as a cancer preventive measure. Macho masculinity was then deemed to be far more valuable than life. Pity. However, the urologist who did tell me how to get my orchiectomy told me that there would be no hint of our ever talking about cancer and cancer risk in the medical records of our clinic sessions. That urologist is now deceased. I did check with that clinic, and, sure enough, not a hint of our talking was put into my records there.
Prejudice and stigma can be among the most damaging of all human beliefs, so I have observed for almost all of my life.
In the 1980s, there was much fear of castration (Freud's castration anxiety?) among many men, so it seemed to me. The doctor who did my "radical vasectomy" did not have practical access to testicular prostheses, because putting them in would have made my orchiectomy traceable to that doctor. So, some time after my orchiectomy, another urologist decided to install prostheses, not for my sake, but for the sake of the fears of others when, for example, I went to a swimming pool where the pre-swimming and post-swimming showers were such that "men" could easily study the equipment of other men.
The prostheses and I got along well enough until the early summer of 2011, when my immune system recognized the prostheses and took strong objection to them. That led to my "second castration," which did not change my testosterone levels at all.
I went through three "testicle" operations, the first to remove the originals, done under local anesthesia, and done with such skill as allowed me to be at work the next morning as though nothing noteworthy had happened; that being done with a pair of typical vasectomy scrotal incisions. The second operation was the inserting of the prostheses, done under local anesthesia inguinally. That operation was done with such skill as allowed me to be working later that day as though nothing of consequence had happened. The third surgery, in 2011, removal of the prostheses, was done using the "vasectomy scars," using local anesthesia, and that surgery left me able to function as though nothing much had happened.
If there is a moral to my saga, it is this. Every such surgery was done by a team that included both females and males, and my purpose was to get the best doctors and nurses available. I have no reason to conceal where the prosthesis surgeries were done, and no reason to name the specific hospital; however, it was one of the main research and teaching hospitals in Chicago at one of the main research universities in Chicago.
I am of the opinion that there is only one class of people in the world, and that all people are "first class," so I sought, and got, first class care. That is also what I want for everyone else.
I have never met a second-class, or lower than second class, person. Cultural fictions notwithstanding, I find that everyone is first class, and properly "deserving" of first class care and decency.
Sorry, but, for me, dying needlessly from preventable cancer is indecent.
geldwish (imported) wrote: Tue May 21, 2013 2:15 am
ould mind forwarding the details of the female urologist who performed your procedure.
Geldwish
You need to locate a female urologist in the UK who would be willing to perform the surgery but prevention alone is not normally a sufficient enough medical justification to have a physician take them out. An orchiectomy is usually considered a "last resort" procedure, after other, less drastic measures have first failed to correct the problem at hand.
From the reading I've done, it seems the USA has a much more accepting and forward thinking approach than the UK regarding surgical castration. I travel extensively throughout the USA on a regular basis and am looking to have the procedure done on a future visit. Once I know of a female urologist who performs the procedure, I will set up a consultation, and at least have a chance of persuading her to perform the procedure on me. Any information on female urologists in the US who perform this procedure will be greatfully received.
