smooth flat young cycle racer

[Peter47-NL (imported)]

Maybe this is not the right place to post this, but don't know where it will suit better. A story suggestion?

The other day I went to a shop. Outside the shop stood a slender blond boy, about 10-11 years old, with two racing bikes and dressed with a helmet and a very tight racing suit. I was so evil that I wanted to see his bulge in the tight suit, as I always want do when I see a man in a tight suit. While entering the shop I had a view on his crotch that seemed to be completely flat. "Oh my god, this boy must still have a hairless crotch, but he seems even to have no genitals!" My fantasy seems to bolt. Inside the shop was a tall fat man also in a racing suit, who must have been the companion the boy was waiting for outside. This companion needed more time than me in the shop, so I had a second change to watch the boy's crotch when I left the shop. This time I noticed the suit had an extra layer of fabric at the crotch that bulged about 1 centimeter, not more. Then I realized that the genitals of boys of that age are hardly developed and hidden behind two tick layers of fabric hardly visible.

[Paolo]

It is enough to get your attention, yes.

I've photo'd kids' wrestling for years, all sorts of sporting events, etc., and it's very easy for boys (if they take the effort) to conceal their packages at that age.

In some cases, snug enough underwear can do it.

In the days of negatives, it was standard practice to have the coaches remind them that any bulging would be seen in images.

Nowadays, we just brush it out with Photoshop.

[Atreyu88 (imported)]

I played sports when I was that age and for competitions I and some of the other boys would make a point of hiding our stuff, but not because the coach told us to. We just sort of enjoyed the fantasy of being smooth. Not a one of us would have really wanted to be cut, it was just sort of a fun game. We tried to see who looked "best" down there.

My guess is the boy with the bike outside the shop was probably doing the same thing. If he was shy he would have been in soccer shorts. If he realized you noticed and wundered if he was a eunuch, that might have made him smile.

Sort of like putting one over on an adult.

[Dave (imported)]

It was probably a bicycle skin suit like the pro's wear and there is a pad built into the crotch area that protects that part of the body from the ravages of bicycle seats. Bicycle seats can do bad things to the urethra.

[kristoff]

Bicycle seats can do bad things to the urethra.

And to the nuts.... not at all unusual for heavy duty bikers to damage them.

[Dave (imported)]

It's like Riding a horse with a western saddle (one with a horn for lassoing)

yank those little suckers up real high and don't sit on them.

It's why "jockey" shorts are called "jockey shorts"

[Atreyu88 (imported)]

It's sort of funny when you stop and think about it. Had you lived at any point of history from 4000 BC up to about 1900 and you saw a boy like that you would have probably just thought, "Oh a gelded boy, nothing special. He might have been fixed for any number of reasons."

It's only in the 20th and 21st century that we can't except the fact that a boy might not be intact. But child eunuchs are not just myths and legends. It's possible that the child you saw was not a boy at all but we are uncomfortable with that reality.

Maybe this is not the right place to post this, but don't know where it will suit better. A story suggestion?

The other day I went to a shop. Outside the shop stood a slender blond boy, about 10-11 years old, with two racing bikes and dressed with a helmet and a very tight racing suit. I was so evil that I wanted to see his bulge in the tight suit, as I always want do when I see a man in a tight suit. While entering the shop I had a view on his crotch that seemed to be completely flat. "Oh my god, this boy must still have a hairless crotch, but he seems even to have no genitals!" My fantasy seems to bolt. Inside the shop was a tall fat man also in a racing suit, who must have been the companion the boy was waiting for outside. This companion needed more time than me in the shop, so I had a second change to watch the boy's crotch when I left the shop. This time I noticed the suit had an extra layer of fabric at the crotch that bulged about 1 centimeter, not more. Then I realized that the genitals of boys of that age are hardly developed and hidden behind two tick layers of fabric hardly visible.

[Peter47-NL (imported)]

The boy outside the shop had indeed a skin suit, which looked as a very pro's one, with an extra layer and an invisible padding to protect his balls and urethra. (BTW I don't believe he toughed that I was thinking he could be a eunuch - that's indeed not usual in our century.) It happened today that my neighbors with their two young sons (about 7 and 5 years old) went on holiday by traveling by bicycle from log cabin to log cabin. These boys too had a bicycle suit and the youngest complained while pulling at his groin:"It hurts!" His suit was not tight at all and the padding looked more like a black inbuilt diaper, it seemed to be bought for the future growth. His father suggested him make a test ride around the block of houses and he seemed to be OK. The shape of the padding was similar to the extra layer of the boy outside the shop the other day.

It sounds very weird to me that genitals of boys have to be extra hided and photoshopped. These neighbors let their boys play naked in summer on the street as many parents of preschoolers do these days. That's much better than it was when I was young. The day we went school swimming my friend put on an extra long undershirt so nobody could see 'anything' while we changed clothes. Others including me were less prudish and not afraid that someone would see our little willie.

Funny how boys played to be smooth, it reminds me of how we too played to be a girl by tucking our penises inside our body and hiding it by pulling our scrotums over the tucked penis.

[Paolo]

As for hiding and Photoshop, maybe it's a regional thing.

No one wants bulging genitals in their pictures of their little athletic stars. Then again, this is a very uptight area full of prudes. You'd NEVER see a naked kid around here playing in a yard sprinkler, and if one did, someone would call the police.

[Dave (imported)]

NBC does it to the Olympics by raising the camera angle or running a graphic of some crap across the bottom of the screen.

Heaven forbid that people should see that many athletes aren't wearing jocks or cups and simple leave their genitals dangle under the fabric.

And there was an article about the "male flesh festival" of Olympic swimmers and divers where men actually touch and hug other men when they congratulate each other.

This is a nation of idiot prudes that get disturbed at the sight of bare buns or fiddly bits.

(speaking in silly euphemisms)