punkypink (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:38 am
Basically the premise of judging a book by the contents not the cover.
I think you meant the opposite lol.
punkypink (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:38 am
There are lots of people here for example, who're into women but will not even give a trans woman a fair look in, especially if they have the "wrong" genitals. I'm willing to bet lots of people into men will not give trans men the same chance either. They claim it is how they're wired. But hell, I used to find the male physique unattractive and even repulsive, but now I understand that gender and sex are 2 distinct categories, I've stopped seeing genitals as "male or female" and that the only thing that matters about them is that they belong to someone I like as a person and that actually makes the idea of ah....playing with it a very attractive prospect. Maybe I've reprogrammed my brain, and I do believe that others are able to do it too despite claims that they're wired that way. But they don't want to try. It's really sad.
The reprogramming of the brain idea is intriguing. Perhaps it is possible for some people but not others? I just can't see myself as ever loving a man in that sort of way. I'm not so sure that I even know how to explain. I remember the gist of a conversation that I had with a best mate many years ago - I think this was before I had personally had any sort of decent interactions with women; so perhaps it was around 2002-04. I didn't say much (well I didn't really have many opinions back then I don't think), but he opened up a bit about his relationship and problems from that time; this hardly ever happens/happened, but sometimes people must just feel comfortable around me to talk a bit. We were just doing this sitting in a car after a night out (probably saw a band), and at the end of his spilling I recall him saying of how lovely it was doing this stuff with me, but that this sort of thing just doesn't compare to being with a woman (and I'm convinced that he wasn't just talking sexually, or was just confused by his sex drive, very nice, sensitive guy my mate too). Actually I think I had mentioned that I was down or didn't understand about the not having had this with a woman thing, and maybe it was then that he spoke of how just opening up with a good mate can be good, but it just can't compare. I agree with this now. I don't believe that whatever changes you make to my body that I am therefore going to be able to 'love' a 'mate' like a do a woman. I don't how that is possible. But maybe that is the point. Maybe I just can't see?
I wouldn't even get to the looking at the genitals point with many, as far as giving people a look in is concerned, and such is my superficiality.
So is there a question here of, could I love a woman if I did love her, but then after removing her knickers she revealed a penis (this is going into Frank Drebin Naked Gun 33 and a third territory lol)? My instant answer would be no, but perhaps I just haven't given that enough thought. So on second thoughts, I actually think that I could (I am almost laughing at myself now as I type), but it would be a case of, "you are, the only exception."
Then it would move on further, and could I have the confidence to reveal this with/to others? Possibly not. As an instant thought that scares me (and I am the guy who wishes all embarrassment/fear to be gone lol), but then again, perhaps the relationship would be so good that I wouldn't care 100% about what anyone else thinks? But even in saying that, I would still have to care; for I doubt that I could continue to work where I do (or pretty much anywhere) with that being out and about - and we do have to earn a living.
I wouldn't want them to fuck me though! Maybe I could just rub one out for them every now and then lol. Playing with it = a very attractive prospect...NOT!
Wow - I am impressed by my writing here
punkypink (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:38 am
Interesting point you've brought up about material comforts btw. I would love to own many material items, but less as a symbol of status, more because I would enjoy them very much. As far as expensive cars go, I'd love the fast ones, not the huge opulent ones, because of what they can do and how enjoyable they are going fast. I also marvel and admire the technology within those fast cars, and if I owned something like a McLaren Mp4-12/c it would not be used in the city to show off, but rather be used on the circuits for the sheer joy of driving. Within the city something small and humble would be much more sensible anyway, especially since I live in London.
A big word of warning to all EA members: Do not get involved with Punky. She has very expensive tastes
As far as the McLaren goes, have you ever thought about hooking up with Rowan Atkinson?!
If I lived in London I wouldn't own a car - the public transport is good enough. On the off chance that I wanted to go into the countryside I would hire one.
punkypink (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:38 am
Other things I'd love to own would be houses with a distinct architectural style that I can enjoy or a history that fascinates me or with technology that makes captures the imagination. I'd love to own a yacht because I really love the sea, I love the ingenuity in design especially with smaller boats and how they can fit everything you need in, and the idea of being able to get away from a society that I truly quite despise at the moment.
As I was warning: I repeat that PP is VERY expensive
Thanks for sharing your mind on the EA PP.