SplitDik (imported) wrote: Fri May 20, 2011 4:29 pm
A-1, you're still assuming that Arnold betrayed Maria somehow, but I think that is a huge stretch. I think she knew that he was a philanderer before they married, I'm sure they had an agreement that he would be free to play around after they were married, I'm sure she knew about this a long time ago, I'm sure she knows what he's actually like (i.e. steroid-fueled brute sexually), etc.
C'mon, S_D, Are you saying that he didn't? I'm sure that you have no idea what they had as an agreement. I'd think that the agreement would have been about money and not screwing around. NOBODY ever gets married with such a prenuptial agreement. I mean, what would be the point? This is ludicrous!
SplitDik (imported) wrote: Fri May 20, 2011 4:29 pm
This whole thing is a typical pattern of the celebrity marriage, and is just an act on all their parts including hers. The only thing she might not like is his choice in who he cheated with, but do you really think that someone from a celebrity family (known for philandering) meeting up with a super-celeb party guy had any actual promise from him to be sexually faithful?
You are making suppositions about relationships that you have no knowledge about that undermines the ideas that created those very institutions we discuss. It is the reason why the institutions exist. This is revealing of your cynicism, but it does not make every relationship follow your concept of reality. There are more things between heaven and Earth, Horatio...
SplitDik (imported) wrote: Fri May 20, 2011 4:29 pm
If he did actually betray her, then that is indeed bad. I just don't think there was any betrayal here (versus her expectations and his promises). I'm sure it still feels kind of shitty for her, but she has got more out of their marriage than most women get.
I think that her wealth was greater than his, as were her political connections. SO it is the opposite. He benefited more from the marriage than she did. It allowed him to shed the image of an immigrant despite the thick accent and it jump-started his political career.
SplitDik (imported) wrote: Fri May 20, 2011 4:29 pm
You should read up more on the idea of "negotiating monogamy". There is a key point in this particular article (
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/1 ... -monogamy/) where they say humans are programmed for "serial monogamy", meaning that we pair up with expectation for monogamy for some period, but it is unnatural for that to be a lifelong arrangement.
No offense, but this is like a Liberal constantly watching Fox hoping to be converted. I may as well start attending Tea Party meetings. I will not be convinced by their propaganda regardless of how they present it.
OMG!
Larry King? Are you being serious?






