Splitdick,
Certainly I do not think that gang tactics are needed to deal with child molesters. But 100 children? Obviously the system has broken down somewhere. So I am a little frustrated in such a situation because I still believe in justice, as I am sure you do.
Clearly, there are those who abuse our system of justice and use it to get away with murder or the equivalent thereof. This is a case in point.
Colin,
I don't know how we went from a castrated child-rapist who molested around 100 children under the age of 12, a considerable number of them AFTER he was castrated to consentual sex between a 17-year-old and a 15-year-old.
In most states the age of consent is 18, unless they decide to try the young person as an adult. In my view, that is a bunch of crap. Children are children. They may grow up to be monsters, but you cannot condemn them as being monsters until they are no longer children.
I also want it made perfectly clear to everyone that the so-called child molestation lists that list the names of 18-21 year olds that impregnated their 16-17 year old lovers is an abuse of the law!
I feel the same about Heterosexual, Bisexual or Gay sexual activities and youngsters who have masturbation activities and such things sexual. I feel that if they are having sex they are not hurting anybody. Moreover, safe sex and reproductive counseling need to be available to them if they are to have the opportunity to engage in such activities.
Don't fool yourselves. Children WILL partake in these activities, regardless of the level of supervision. If they decide to they will. They cannot be stopped. This is where adults come in. As adults we need to HELP children to learn to control themselves sexually, not show them how NOT to control themselves sexually.
Surely, people who read this who are thinking of Eunuchdom as an alternative to the misery caused in some circumstances by sex can appreciate this point.
The people who would have such laws that protect children and families by creating and maintaining sexual preditor lists repealed are attempting to make a point. It is a point that I DO NOT agree with.
The laws that create "child molestation offender lists" are good laws. I cannot imagine that a lot of people check them very often, but still, the resource is there if you need it.
As far as Pot-Pol, et. al., I am not sure that you can compare executing incorrigible child-molesting rapists with genocide. Again, we are talking multiple RAPES and penetrative sex here, not just fondling.
I guess that until you have held your own child in your arms you cannot appreciate the rage that can come when you think of somebody sexually abusing or killing that child. I can assure you that it is DECIDEDLY NOT "hysteria". IT IS BLIND FUCKING RIP THEIR INTESTINES OUT WITH YOUR TEETH RAGE!
You know, I know of a case where a 20-something year-old man raped his 18-month old daughter anally and never did that first day behind bars. Oh, yes, he was "criminally insane". Again, I would have taken this creep's spinal cord out at T-3 with whatever instrument that would best do the job cleanly.
Hell, I would have ran over him with a piece of heavy equipment and smashed the bastard like the insect micro-phallus that he is and then went out for a big Lobster meal to celebrate that at least there was one baby-raper who would never offend again.
Again, I realize that most children experiment with sex. There is nothing wrong with that. They do not need adults to critique them or to "exchange favors" with them, however. Invariably, when adults are involved with children sexually the children are being taken advantage of regardless of consent or anything else. If as an adult we have to have sex with children then there is something terribly wrong.
Children need adults in their lives to provide stability, not to provide sexual outlets. As adults we have a responsibility to nurture and to protect children. We also have a responsibility...how might I put it?...NOT TO FUCK WITH THEM.
The attitude that "maybe once is O.K." invariably leads to continued, repetitive, sexual contact with a minor. Once the barrier is crossed, it is so appealing and attractive to have sex with a young, healthy body. When it happens it is just plain taking advantage of the minor by the adult.
By adult, I mean somebody who is over 21. By "child" I would suppose that under 16 - 18 would do depending on the circumstances. Again, you are absolutely correct, there are gray areas, but only when the age differences are not vast.
Again, keep in mind that as I have said soooo many times here and elsewhere. Insanity or crime is not the thought...it is the ACTION. If people are held accountable most people will exhibit control. Those who do not need to accept their consequences and quit whining.
Of course, there are circumstances that need lieniency,...but raping 100
A-1 (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2002 4:27 pm
little girls under the age of 12?
You better damned well believe that I would shoot the son-of-a-bitch if I could get by with it. Furthermore, the apology would come only when HELL freezes over...
:realpisse A-1 :realpisse
A-1