I"m male, live in Russia, and I'm 53 y/o.
I have a great sexual experience - I got a lot of females and always tried to give them the best I could.
A long time ago, when I was a little child, I played, as every child (male or female) does, with my genitalia.
My mom forbade it, but... And once, when she caught me once more, when I layed in my bed in the evening, she left and came back with the knife and told me: "Now I'll cut your male parts. I always wanted a girl, but I bore you,
a boy. Now I'll make you a girl, you'll have a flat crotch and you won't play with your
male parts - you won't have it!"
Of course, she wanted to scarce me to prevent from playing witn my male parts.
I will never forget this feeling of fear - to be without my male parts... But somewhere in deep of my mind I felt a feeling of curiousity - how it will be to live without male parts, to become a girl, with this astonishing emptyness between the thighs?
When I grew older, I knew about eunuchs. And they interested me more and more, their origine, how they became eunuchs, their way of life etc.
I collected all possible materials about castration and eunuchs in history from ancient times up today during 25 years. I red almost all books on that. I searched for facts of castration in any literature.
Most of females aren't interested in this problem.
But long time ago I began to feel, that I can get a sexual satisfaction and orgasms not in usual male way, penetrating into female, but I get huge orgasms only licking female clits and labia.
I don't need to have an intercourse with female. I don't need to use my penis - I feel a great joy, looking at female, having orgasms after my kiising of her clit and parts...
I began to interest Lesbian plays, their technics of satisfaction and achieving orgasms. I went to idea, that a real pleasure for females can be acieved only during the play with females. Who can better know, where to lick etc? And who can better feel the joy, resulting from these efforts? No mistakes in selecting the places and techics in these plays - female understands female - they feel the same!!!
But male - a male is a slave of his male parts, of his impatience to achieve his own orgasm as soon as possible. And he forgets about female needs, triyng to achievó it.
In history of sex is well-known, that Oriental eunuchs were great masters of female satisfaction - females, who tasted the sex with eunuchs (in harems, where it was strictly forbidden, but it was a commom practice - sex between the eunuchs and concubines!) accused their males, that they couldn't do "what eunuch did simply and effectively!".
Eunuchs were great masters of licking and rubbing of females' pussies and bodies, and those eunuchs, who were not deprived of their penises (so-called "white eunuchs" - only their testicles were cut!), could "pump" in female vagina a long-long time without discharging and softening of penis.
If the task of a real male is to give a female the most powerful and possible orgasms, it looks, that this male should be an eunuch for to solve this problem.
He must not think of his own pleasures, but it is possible only in one case, when he can't have pleasure at all, being deprived of male parts...
So I came to this, possibly strange and paradox conclusion - it is necessary to become an eunuch for to serve the female in the best way...
I envy to female parts, especially to female clits. I adore them, dream of them and would like to have the clit for to know these feelings, which are concerned with having of clit, but I understand, that it's impossible...
The thoughts about my emasculation visit me more and more often - it looks, that I want fully to deprive myself of the possibility to achieve the orgasms in normal males' ways.
To be emasculated by female and then to serve her as her eunuch, ready every moment to give her pleasure and satisfaction with my fingers and tongue so many times as she wishes - these thoughts are more and more attractive for me...
Is it strange for you? Or you can understand it and adopt it as a norm for male, who wishes to give a female all what she wants and all what he can do for her?
I adore females, I envy them and would like to give them the pleasure and orgasms, forgetting about myself.
Strange male, who doesn't want to be male.
Re.: strange intends
-
goering (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
haltlos (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 11:25 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
"Is it strange for you?"
Well, where do you think you are?
And to be faster than paolo this time:
Welcome to the zoo!
No, your desire is not as strange as you might think and whatever you want to know or to do, this is probably the best place to talk it through.
But just therefore let me go into one detail of your reasoning yet that I have heared too often now. I've got a problem with this:
"
This is a STEREOTYPE.
I have heared that so often from males as from females but WHENEVER I got into more detailed talking then it suddenly turned out like exactly the OPPOSITE.
Yes!
Now I don't think one way or the other is the only truth!
MY experience for example IS:
When I talk to people more closely and longer MEN seem to be very aware of the complexness of woman's sexuality AND the pleasure of theire partner is essential for their own joy.
And they are able to realize and talk about that.
WOMEN tend more to underestimate men's sexual needs and feelings as many seem to really believe in those STEREOTYPES:
"Men just need a warm something to stick theire thing into."
"If a man is horny he will fuck EVERYTHING", and so on, and so on some more.
Now, that is a TENDENCY I seem to notice!
But the hole STEREOTYPE is bullshit alltogether!
At least that's MY experience too.
"
Now I can come to a point with that:
Easily. I mean, where are we?
It should be COMMON SENSE nowadays that your partners pleasure is also the most pleasuring thing to YOU!
AND that counts for BOTH PARTS! (See above)
And that way you mutualy give pleasure to each other; at the same time, by turns, always around, one longer, one quick, one loud, one I-don't-know, swinging back and forth not able to decide if it's more pleasurable now to recive or to give..., HELL do I have to explain SEX here?
SO!?
"
Now THAT is the mistake!
Dear westfolding, I hope I'm not offending you, I'm just taking the opportunity and try to make claer what I find wrong in ONE thing you said and just becvause I heared it too often...
So this goes to all.
How do you think you can pleasure ANYBODY if you can not feel the pleasure YOURSELF ???
Imagine having sex with a woman who doesn't feel ANYTHING!
Is THAT pleasure?
I don't think so.
But Westfolding, regardless of this, I also have that fascination with beeing emasculated and I'm not really clear what to begin with it.
I only know, I'm also fascinated with GIRLS and with SEX and whatever benifits castration has: It will NOT make me a better LOVER!

ups, have to do a little shopping now, before it starts raining...

Love
Gus
Well, where do you think you are?
And to be faster than paolo this time:
Welcome to the zoo!
No, your desire is not as strange as you might think and whatever you want to know or to do, this is probably the best place to talk it through.
But just therefore let me go into one detail of your reasoning yet that I have heared too often now. I've got a problem with this:
"
e it. "goering (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm But male - a male is a slave of his male parts, of his impatience to achieve his own orgasm as soon as possible. And he forgets about female needs, triyng to achiev
This is a STEREOTYPE.
I have heared that so often from males as from females but WHENEVER I got into more detailed talking then it suddenly turned out like exactly the OPPOSITE.
Yes!
Now I don't think one way or the other is the only truth!
MY experience for example IS:
When I talk to people more closely and longer MEN seem to be very aware of the complexness of woman's sexuality AND the pleasure of theire partner is essential for their own joy.
And they are able to realize and talk about that.
WOMEN tend more to underestimate men's sexual needs and feelings as many seem to really believe in those STEREOTYPES:
"Men just need a warm something to stick theire thing into."
"If a man is horny he will fuck EVERYTHING", and so on, and so on some more.
Now, that is a TENDENCY I seem to notice!
But the hole STEREOTYPE is bullshit alltogether!
At least that's MY experience too.
"
"goering (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm If the task of a real male is to give a female the most powerful and possible orgasms...
Now I can come to a point with that:
Easily. I mean, where are we?
It should be COMMON SENSE nowadays that your partners pleasure is also the most pleasuring thing to YOU!
AND that counts for BOTH PARTS! (See above)
And that way you mutualy give pleasure to each other; at the same time, by turns, always around, one longer, one quick, one loud, one I-don't-know, swinging back and forth not able to decide if it's more pleasurable now to recive or to give..., HELL do I have to explain SEX here?
SO!?
"
"goering (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm it is necessary to become an eunuch for to serve the female in the best way..."
"He must not think of his own pleasures, but it is possible only in one case, when he can't have pleasure at all, being deprived of male parts
Now THAT is the mistake!
Dear westfolding, I hope I'm not offending you, I'm just taking the opportunity and try to make claer what I find wrong in ONE thing you said and just becvause I heared it too often...
So this goes to all.
How do you think you can pleasure ANYBODY if you can not feel the pleasure YOURSELF ???
Imagine having sex with a woman who doesn't feel ANYTHING!
Is THAT pleasure?
I don't think so.
But Westfolding, regardless of this, I also have that fascination with beeing emasculated and I'm not really clear what to begin with it.
I only know, I'm also fascinated with GIRLS and with SEX and whatever benifits castration has: It will NOT make me a better LOVER!
ups, have to do a little shopping now, before it starts raining...
Love
Gus
-
goering (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
Dear Gus,
thank you for interest to my ideas.
Let's establish the meaning of word "eunuch" - it will be easier to understand each other. Eunuch is an ex-male, fully deprived of male parts (so he is to pee sitting and through the pipe, inserted in urethra
))),
as Chinese eunuchs, which were fully emasculated).
In case of depriving of only a penis, it is "castrate", like
white eunuchs in Muslim Orient or Italian castrati-singers.
So there can be the only satisfaction for eunuch, when he is with female -
mental satisfaction (no penis, no frictions, no standard orgasms with
ejaculation of sperma - all this is absent!).
And this satisfaction, as I think, will appear throgh the view of female,
which is in mad orgasm and convulsions, as a result of the efforts of this eunuch.
I got these feelings myself (after a very good cunnilingus to female -
I'm not castrate or eunuch yet, but I imagined that I AM during these efforts!).
And I felt huge excitement and the ability to lick and care her clit, cunt and G-spot inside much more, then without these imaginations.
So I can answer you, that in this case of sex intercourse of female with eunuch can't be
mutual orgasms and pleasures - all this affair is intended to achieve female's pleasure
and female must understand it.
Believe me - they get it with joy and very fast their words about "You should have a satisfaction too, etc" transform into "mur-murs" and then into loud breathing and shouts of excitement...
But that's what I want to achieve and my pleasure is namely in seeing and listening of that.
I always will think that female is the best creation of Mother-Nature and she's got the right to satisfy as much as possible.
If there were the brothels for females, as it was in Medieval Italy (from IX century AD), served by castrates (!!!) and very popular among females, I would go there to serve... But there were namely castrates (no testicles, but having penises!), so it's not exactly I would like to do...
So may be I explained my opinion to you, that there's no an idea about mutual satisfaction, but namely satisfaction for female and to female, forgetting about me...
Best wishes.
westfolding.
Hope, this thread will attract the attention of females and they will tell something on that...
thank you for interest to my ideas.
Let's establish the meaning of word "eunuch" - it will be easier to understand each other. Eunuch is an ex-male, fully deprived of male parts (so he is to pee sitting and through the pipe, inserted in urethra
as Chinese eunuchs, which were fully emasculated).
In case of depriving of only a penis, it is "castrate", like
white eunuchs in Muslim Orient or Italian castrati-singers.
So there can be the only satisfaction for eunuch, when he is with female -
mental satisfaction (no penis, no frictions, no standard orgasms with
ejaculation of sperma - all this is absent!).
And this satisfaction, as I think, will appear throgh the view of female,
which is in mad orgasm and convulsions, as a result of the efforts of this eunuch.
I got these feelings myself (after a very good cunnilingus to female -
I'm not castrate or eunuch yet, but I imagined that I AM during these efforts!).
And I felt huge excitement and the ability to lick and care her clit, cunt and G-spot inside much more, then without these imaginations.
So I can answer you, that in this case of sex intercourse of female with eunuch can't be
mutual orgasms and pleasures - all this affair is intended to achieve female's pleasure
and female must understand it.
Believe me - they get it with joy and very fast their words about "You should have a satisfaction too, etc" transform into "mur-murs" and then into loud breathing and shouts of excitement...
But that's what I want to achieve and my pleasure is namely in seeing and listening of that.
I always will think that female is the best creation of Mother-Nature and she's got the right to satisfy as much as possible.
If there were the brothels for females, as it was in Medieval Italy (from IX century AD), served by castrates (!!!) and very popular among females, I would go there to serve... But there were namely castrates (no testicles, but having penises!), so it's not exactly I would like to do...
So may be I explained my opinion to you, that there's no an idea about mutual satisfaction, but namely satisfaction for female and to female, forgetting about me...
Best wishes.
westfolding.
Hope, this thread will attract the attention of females and they will tell something on that...
-
drew28 (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:36 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
Hi I want to be a female for the reasons you mentioned. No need to have to orgasm as quick as possible. To be a whole and complete woman to the best of my ability. To have emotional feelings I am excited to go through that process. I really should be a woman. I do not see myself fitting in to this world best as a man anyway. I behave like a woman and find that satisfying my partner is so important. It would be nice to not have the need to have to satisfy just myself.
-
Kangan (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:24 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
Wow! A very interesting and thought provoking thread.
My main reason for wanting to be a eunuch is to please my wife by reducing my unnatural and excessive desires which conflict with her needs and beliefs. Often I find that I cannot orgasm unless I am in a group sex situation (real or imagined) - she, on the other hand, finds a group scene (or talk about it) to be a turn off. Since she is easily satisfied by masturbation and oral means, I do not have to have intercourse to satisfy her.
My main reason for wanting to be a eunuch is to please my wife by reducing my unnatural and excessive desires which conflict with her needs and beliefs. Often I find that I cannot orgasm unless I am in a group sex situation (real or imagined) - she, on the other hand, finds a group scene (or talk about it) to be a turn off. Since she is easily satisfied by masturbation and oral means, I do not have to have intercourse to satisfy her.
-
Jeanio (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:19 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
goering (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2002 11:27 pm A long time ago, when I was a little child, I played, as every child (male or female) does, with my genitalia.
My mom forbade it, but... And once, when she caught me once more, when I layed in my bed in the evening, she left and came back with the knife and told me: "Now I'll cut your male parts. I always wanted a girl, but I bore you,
a boy. Now I'll make you a girl, you'll have a flat crotch and you won't play with your
male parts - you won't have it!"
Of course, she wanted to scarce me to prevent from playing witn my male parts.
I will never forget this feeling of fear - to be without my male parts... But somewhere in deep of my mind I felt a feeling of curiousity - how it will be to live without male parts, to become a girl, with this astonishing emptyness between the thighs?
Another example of the mother's role in starting interest in castration. Last summer on the beach I saw a girl with a son of about 5 y.o. He was running naked about and the mother said to him: "Don't run so fast or your pee-pee will fall off and you'll become a girl!" I wonder what ideas she might put into the boy"s head by saying so.
-
Kangan (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:24 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
Jeanio (imported) wrote: Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:27 am Another example of the mother's role in starting interest in castration. Last summer on the beach I saw a girl with a son of about 5 y.o. He was running naked about and the mother said to him: "Don't run so fast or your pee-pee will fall off and you'll become a girl!" I wonder what ideas she might put into the boy"s head by saying so.
What a classic example of how a parent's casual remark can cause a life long psychological trauma.
-
Jeanio (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:19 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Re.: strange intends
Kangan (imported) wrote: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:49 am What a classic example of how a parent's casual remark can cause a life long psychological trauma.
Undoubtly such remarks are apt to inspire the Freudian castartion anxiety in young boys. It's interesting but my mother hardly ever gave me that sort of complex. Her comments on the testicle vulnerability presented me the idea of my sister and mother herself having the advantage over me of not possessing the male genitalia. So I didn't felt strictly in the Freudian way when little boys think that girls are just unlucky boys who'd lost their penises. For me they were lucky ones compared to me or other boys.