gareth19 (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:35 pm That of course is merely anecdotal evidence; in controlled studies, groups of patients receiving Freudian therapy did no better than untreated patients. Scientific conclusion: orthodox Freudian psychotherapy is 100% medically ineffective. The idea of Woody Allen or Robin Williams spending a lifetime paying a therapist for vague, leading responses is almost funny, if it were not criminally deceptive. The late Albert Ellis argued thjat psychotherapy should last no more than 6 months; if at the end of that period, the patient wasn't better, he should find a competent therapist. Widely regarded as a crank when he first shone light on the practices of the Freudians, Ellis's cognative therapy that seeks to influence behavior rather than regress to causes and origins is pretty much mainstream thought today.
So you are saying that you have a scientific study to prove to people that they are not experiencing what they are experiencing. Science can only measure what is measurable. The results of therapy have to be judged by the people involved. Cognative therapy is one of the more effective therapies, but it doesn't work for everybody. You keep trying till you find what works for you. The studies you mention were basicly designed to justify insurance companies limiting mental health coverage.
It's like Bokonon said of religion, "Anyone who doesn't understand how a useful religion can be founded on nothing but lies, doesn't understand religion."
Transward