Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

kkks (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 5:17 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by kkks (imported) »

Mac (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2002 5:14 am Boys are conditioned to look forward to beard and body hair growth.

Why?

I was not.
Dave (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 6:06 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by Dave (imported) »

Of all the outrageous things I have read on this board, a) torching the hair off your body , and b) chemical removal with brake fluid are the most outrageous. Whatever floats your boat!

Did anyone see the picture of the featherless chicken?

To paraphrase Jon Stewart, it looks like a wrinkled scrotum from my going to work naked nightmare!!!!

But seriously folks, at 10 I had hair on my arms and legs and no nuts for another three years. At 17 I could pass for 21 and get served alcohol due to the heavy beard. At 25 I had blond-haired friends with no body hair who were getting carded in bars...

So if you want to stop hair growth, you gotta start early. But remember, testosterone causes growth and muscle development.

Dave
Paolo
Articles: 0
Posts: 9709
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 8:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by Paolo »

Bodily hair growth is caused by FSH, Folicle Stimulating Hormone, which is also release at puberty and later on. Some lucky boys/men don't ever grow much beard/body hair, because they produce plenty of testosterone but little to no FSH. Find some way to block FSH, and the hair issue is pretty much under control.

Hair loss on the body is also a "YMMV" thing. When my own levels began to drop, I lost about 50%-75% of my body hair, but a bit of it came back. I still have too much for my liking.

There's really no great way to remove hair. Shaving is risky, time consuming, and leaves ingrown hairs and you itch if you dont' keep doing it. Cream like Nair don't work, electrolysis is costly and painful, and waxing just f*cking HURTS!

As far as controlling it for a boy who doesn't want it, well, I'd say I have no clue.
luvpain (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 582
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 10:12 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by luvpain (imported) »

Paolo wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2002 8:51 pm Bodily hair growth is caused by FSH, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, which is also release at puberty and later on. Some lucky boys/men don't ever grow much beard/body hair, because they produce plenty of testosterone but little to no FSH. Find some way to block FSH, and the hair issue is pretty much under control.

....

There's really no great way to remove hair. Shaving is risky, time consuming, and leaves ingrown hairs and you itch if you dont' keep doing it. Cream like Nair don't work, electrolysis is costly and painful, and waxing just f*cking HURTS!

Hmm, what hasn't someone come up with a FSH blocking pill???

No more having to shave, worry about ingrown hairs, pain from wax, electrolysis or the other common hair removal methods.

OK well I can only think of one problem with that, it would probably make you bald also, but hey then I don't have to spend $15 or more for a good hair cut, no more styling my hair every morning. Hmm you know I think I like that Idea too. :p Then I could blind people with my polished bald head.:tongueout 😄
kkks (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 5:17 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by kkks (imported) »

Paolo wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2002 8:51 pm Cream like Nair don't work, electrolysis is costly and painful, and waxing just f*cking HURTS!

Somehow laser is cheaper and less painful, if you have dark hair and light skin.
A-1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by A-1 (imported) »

I say that we should find what gene grows hair on our bodies and eliminate it from the human species.

I absoultely LOVE the look of hairlessness on women. Bald babes!

Hell yeah! That's the ticket. If people cannot get use to it let them buy wigs.

😄 A-1😄
luvpain (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 582
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 10:12 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by luvpain (imported) »

kkks (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2002 10:12 pm Somehow laser is cheaper and less painful, if you have dark hair and light skin.

Yes have researched the cost of having laser used, but is still outside my price range. The pain of electrolysis is not really a concern; the price and time required are my main issues, besides being a little embarrassed having them work on me.
Close Shave (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 10:28 am

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by Close Shave (imported) »

A-1 (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2002 10:15 pm I say that we should find what gene grows hair on our bodies and eliminate it from the human species.

I absoultely LOVE the look of hairlessness on women. Bald babes!

Hell yeah! That's the ticket. If people cannot get use to it let them buy wigs.

😄 A-1😄

Bald babies? what state do you live in? Aren't there laws?
smokey eunuch (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 12:55 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by smokey eunuch (imported) »

aw c'mon cs, ain't you never had some bald kooter? besides yer 8 year old sister?
Close Shave (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 10:28 am

Posting Rank

Re: Preempting hair growth in pre-pubescent boys

Post by Close Shave (imported) »

smokey eunuch (imported) wrote: Sat Jun 15, 2002 6:19 am aw c'mon cs, ain't you never had some bald kooter? besides yer 8 year old sister?

I was told to keep it in the family
Post Reply

Return to “Eunuch Central”