stinger503 (imported) wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:19 am
I believe JustAGuy was just giving his honest opinion about serial stories. He even backs it up (something often not seen on the internet) by saying that continuity becomes an issue. He then states the size of story he prefers.
The thread title wasn't "The size of story I prefer," though. It wasn't even "Stories too long for my taste." Other users in that thread had to point out that best-selling mainstream authors like JK Rowling and Steven King write almost exclusively long stories broken up into many chapters ("novels") because the complaint was not so much "this one user prefers shorter stories" as "nobody wants longer stories and the longer ones are pushing out the ones we really want." (I was paraphrasing there. Those are not direct quotes. You don't need to dig out direct quotes to "prove" me "wrong.")
stinger503 (imported) wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:19 am
I also feel that saying he's bitching, doesn't have to read them, isn't paying for it, etc. isn't really justified. We are in a author feedback board after all, what's wrong with saying your preferred length of story?
As I just said -- and had already pointed out in the "What is so difficult about
8)..." thread -- saying what kinds of stories one personally prefers is fine, and should be encouraged.
Posting 1,000 words complaining about what one doesn't like and including 10 words saying what one does prefer doesn't count as positive feedback.
The author feedback board is not a place for heaping abuse on authors. (Constructive criticism is a different issue, but the difference between constructive and non-constructive feedback is something that will have to be addressed elsewhere.) The authors who post here don't get paid, any more than the admins do; they're all writing and submitting so that other people have something to read, knowing that the majority of people who do read their story won't even give them even one sentence of feedback.
If the "too long" thread had been more along the lines of "I've noticed a lot more long stories lately, wonder why that is" or "long or short stories, which do others prefer" then it could have been neutral in tone. Claiming that a short statement along the lines "...what I'd like to see more of is this" following paragraphs of complaints insinuating that one's dislike of certain types of stories is a general rule -- which is nearly as insulting to those who do enjoy such stories as it is to the authors for submitting them and the admins for putting the stories up -- makes the overall tone neutral is, given the current situation, at best ignorant and at worst malicious.
What was wrong with the post and comments you're asking about was that those statements were not just "this is what I enjoy and would like to see more of." There was a great deal of "I want this, I am entitled to read this, and screw the many people who want to write or read anything not to my personal taste, only what I want counts." Reread the thread in question with this in mind, trying to put yourself in the shoes of a) an author of long stories, b) a reader who enjoys or even prefers long stories including multi-part ones, and/or c) an admin who spends more time in a given week than you probably spend reading this site for relaxation at keeping the site up and running. Does it still seem that disagreeing
stinger503 (imported) wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:19 am
with the complainers' phrasing "isn't really justified"?
With the RSS feed thing, I actually disagree with him because a new chapter of a story is indeed new and people who are following the serial might want to know that a new part is out. But still, there's nothing wrong with him wishing or wanti
ng those out, he j
something wrong with him wishing or wanting those out, if in order to please him, everyone who does want to read the multi-chapter serial stories has to suffer.
No matter how much someone might enjoy a McDonald's sausage-on-french-toast sandwich, that doesn't give them the right to go into a McDonald's restaurant and start yelling about how cheeseburgers suck and McDonald's needs to stop selling sandwiches with beef patties on buns so he can have more sausage-on-french-toast sandwiches. Indeed, if someone were to behave that way, the McDonald's manager would probably tell them they were disturbing other customers and ask them to leave, and if necessary the manager might call the police to make sure the complainer left. Conversely, if such a person instead went into a McDonald's and approached the manager, or wrote to the corporate offices, to politely praise the sausage-on-french-toast sandwich and express a wish for it to be available all day, their opinion would be welcomed -- and maybe even rewarded, perhaps with that one McDonald's location adding the sandwich to its lunch, dinner or late-night menus, or perhaps with a coupon mailed back to the customer good fo
stinger503 (imported) wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:19 am
r future purchases of sausage-on-french-toast sandwiches.
If there are other issues from ot
her threads/messages then I'll have to plead ignorance.
Not to speak for the admins, but I suspect the way the feedback thread for "The New Neighbor Boy" got almost completely taken over by personal attacks against both the author and anyone who was enjoying the story may have contributed to the decision to freeze new submissions. IIRC there was also at least one thread created fairly recently just to complain about an author who had submitted poorly-formatted stories -- years ago -- under bboy, and in which it was implied that blame for allowing such annoying stories on the archive was as much the admins' fault as it was the author's. And I'm going to presume, being new to the forums as I am, that there are other threads I didn't (yet) see that also factored into the decision... plus who knows what kind of abuse the admins may have taken privately, via email or otherwise, from complainers.
I'm sure if you skim through the threads in
that have been started or commented on in the week before submissions were frozen, you'll find non-JustAGuy examples of stuff that might have contributed to the decision. I haven't gone looking specifically for evidence of who might have said what that factored into the decision, but I did come across plenty that seemed like it might have while just browsing the forums.
Punishing everyone else because one person pissed them off doesn't seem like how admins here handle problems, anyway. On the contrary, they seem to hand out temporary bans even to users they expect to misbehave again once their temporary ban is lifted; whereas on most sites, either once you're banned you're gone forever, or you face several bans of increasing severity but will still eventually be permanently banned.